Charles Hapgood
In his book “The Path of the Pole”, Professor Charles Hapgood writes (quote from “The Orion Prophecy” by Patrick Geryl):
“I have found evidence of three different positions of the North Pole in recent time. During the last glaciation of the North America the pole appears to have stood in Hudson Bay, approximately in latitude 60 degrees North and longitude 83 degrees West. It seems to have shifted to its present site in the middle of the Arctic Ocean about 12,000 years ago.
The radioactive dating methods further suggest that the pole came to Hudson Bay about 50,000 year ago, having been located before that time in the Greenland Sea, approximately in latitude 73 degrees North and longitude 10 degrees East. 30,000 years earlier the pole may have been in the Yukon District of Canada.
Powerful confirmation of another of the corollaries of a pole located in Hudson Bay comes from Antarctica. With the North Pole at latitude 60 degrees North and longitude 83 degrees West, the corresponding South Pole would have been located at latitude 60 degrees South and longitude 97 degrees East in the ocean off the Mac-Roberston Coast of Queen Maud Land, Antarctica. This would place the South Pole about seven times farther away from the head of the Ross Sea in Antarctica than it is now. We should expect, then, that the Ross Sea would not have been glaciated at that time.”
The above evidence clearly show that “from time to time” our Earth is subject to the process of pole shift. Most “prominent” scientists claim that the process of pole shift is continuous and very slow. These “great scientists”, however, reject evidence from such researchers as Professor Charles Hapgood and pretend everything is OK. Is it?
You can discuss this topic in our forum